Women and the Anti-war movement


         Understanding Antiwar Activism as a Gendering Activity: A Look at the U.S.’s Anti-Vietnam War Movement 

http://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1073&context=jiws


This sources elaborates on the role women played in the Anti-war movement. One of the misconceptions of the anti-war movement that I will argue against in my paper is that the movement was male dominated. However, this academic paper also argues against that hence I will be able to use examples from this paper to support my claim. Moreover this paper includes counterclaims made by feminist scholars and works towards disproving that claim. Specifically the article centers upon two questions, in what ways is war protest a gendering experience? and How does antiwar activism shape ideas about gender, instead of the other way around? The analysis of these two questions relies on a combination of primary sources : documents written by antiwar activists or observers of the movement and secondary research from historians, sociologists and gender scholars. It examines particularly two instances from the movement which are the ‘Burial of Traditional Womanhood’ in January of 1968 and the Pentagon protest  which took place in October 1967. By analysing these specific two instances the paper goes into the details and doesn’t just analyses it superficaially and thus I feel this will be a good source to include in my paper.

Comments

  1. Anonymous6 December 2017 at 18:54

    Aye Myat Mon

    I have never thought about the anti-war movement from a gender perspective. This is definitely an intriguing aspect to this movement. Why do you think it is important to analyze the role of gender in this movement? Were there anything women and men did differently while protesting?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nick Mehlman7 December 2017 at 07:29

    Its interesting how this source hilights the interesection between two socail issues: the war and femminism. Does it seem to suggest that being involved in their anti-war movement also helped woman obtain more fair/equal treatment?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Critiquing the representation of social justice

Image
After working with and writing on your chosen representation, critique the version or manifestation of social justice as defined/illustrated.  How does this depiction of social justice conflict with or work with the legal system? Social Justice can be defined as equity in terms of distribution of wealth, rights and resources within society. The movie Blood Diamond attempts to uncover the lack of this in third world countries as a direct result of the actions of first world countries while demonstrating the advantages people have for having white skin in certain societies. The movie highlights a practice which according to the law is considered smuggling and thus by those means cannot be considered social injustice, however, it is chain reaction caused by this smuggling that makes the practice unethical and socially unjust. The manifestation of social justice in The Blood Diamond is made explicit through the film's plot and central theme, however, throughout the movi...
Read more

Social Justice In Blood Diamond

Social justice is fairness interns of wealth, rights and opportunities. Though idealistically every country should be enforcing this the world is still rampant with social inequality. To spread awareness about these issues some people make movies and one such movie is Blood Diamond. The movie is set in war ridden Sierra Leone in the 1990's and the center story of the film focuses on the journey of the two protagonists Solomon ( A black fisherman)  and Danny ( A white South African mercenary)  who move across the country trying to recover a rare diamond and rescue Solomons son who has been recruited by the rebels. Through this story line the movie showcases the extent of racial injustice present in the world while simultaneously highlighting the problem of warfare in Africa with an emphasis on the social and ethical issue of using children in warfare. Solomons son Dia, wanted to become a doctor when he grew up, however when he was kidnapped and brainwashed by the rebels...
Read more

Distinction should be made on the basis of crime

What do you think the goal of criminal punishment should be?  Would you differentiate between types of crime? Types of offenders? The main goal of criminal punishment should be to punish the criminal for his or her crimes and serving as a form of rehabilitation so that when they reintegrated back into society they do not cause any more harm all while providing justice to the victim. While the other goals should include the possibility of incentivizing people to stay within confines of the law and promote fairness in terms of distribution of opportunity, rights, and resources. I believe it is absolutely critical to differentiate between types of offenders.  Primarily this distinction should be made on the basis of the type of crime: Violent or Non- violent. This is because nonviolent crimes are not as severe as violent crimes and thus nonviolent criminals should be punished, in comparison less than someone who is a violent criminal. Moreover, it is important to physically...
Read more